Vendors
日本語

Insurance BPO Market Survey

Create a vendor selection project
Click to express your interest in this report
Indication of coverage against your requirements
A subscription is required to activate this feature. Contact us for more info.
Celent have reviewed this profile and believe it to be accurate.
We are waiting for the vendor to publish their solution profile. Contact us or request the RFX.
Projects allow you to export Registered Vendor details and survey responses for analysis outside of Marsh CND. Please refer to the Marsh CND User Guide for detailed instructions.
Download Registered Vendor Survey responses as PDF
Contact vendor directly with specific questions (ie. pricing, capacity, etc)
31 August 2004

Abstract

Boston, MA, USA August 31, 2004

There are several ongoing insurance BPO deals. But survey results suggest that carriers are not in a hurry to broaden their efforts, despite their success with ITO. Celent predicts BPO spending for core insurance services will grow at a modest rate through 2006, reaching nearly US$3 billion by then.

Insurance carriers know that outsourcing can help them achieve strategic objectives, but lingering questions about business process outsourcing have prevented dramatic increases in its use.

"Almost everyone agrees that BPO is an approach with great potential to improve business flexibility and lower costs,"

says senior analyst Craig Weber, author of Celent's latest report: " : Will The Watched Pot Ever Boil?" "But there are still unanswered questions preventing the explosion of BPO that seemed like a done deal several years ago."

The report summarizes current insurance BPO activity, analyzing deals by several factors, including carrier type, carrier size, and business processes covered. It is based on deal-level data supplied by 14 BPO providers active in North America, representing a total of 194 insurance BPO deals. Participating providers are Accenture, ACS, CGI, Computer Sciences Corporation, Connextions, EDS, First Notice Systems, HCL Technologies, IBM, Keane, Unisys, Wipro, WNS, and Xerox.

Weber says many carriers remain unconvinced that outside parties can develop sufficient insurance vertical expertise. "And even if vendors can prove they have the expertise, there are other considerations, like the additional costs of managing outside resources," Weber says. Negative fallout from a skeptical public is also affecting carrier decisions to move forward with BPO, he adds.

Other key findings of the report:

  • Systems-related activities (e.g., hosting of policy administration systems, complete management of a carrier's IT) are common types of services provided as part of BPO deals.
  • Many insurance BPO deals are limited in scope.
  • TPAs are "stealth" providers that dominate emerging competitors in key BPO areas such as claims management and adjudication
  • .

The report identifies Computer Sciences Corporation as a clear leader in terms of providing BPO to North American carriers, as it is among the top providers in terms of both estimated BPO staff and estimated BPO revenue. CSC is also named as the category leader in seven out of eight BPO "meta-processes" used to classify BPO deals. The report also identifies EDS, ACS, IBM, and First Notice as BPO providers with a solid current market presence.

A Table of contents is available online.

of Celent Communications' Life/Health Insurance and Property/Casualty Insurance research services can download the report electronically by clicking on the icon to the left. Non-members should contact info@celent.com for more information.

Send mail to info@celent.com with questions or comments about this Web site.