LEGACY MODERNIZATION IN INSURANCE INDUSTRY, Part 1
This post series examines the current status and future directions of legacy modernization in Japan’s insurance industry.
It is based on a legacy modernization survey Celent conducted in 2015. The survey targeted insurers, financial institutions, and brokers. It was supplemented with additional information gathered in follow-up interviews.
The new two-part report is an extension of this work that narrows the focus to the insurance sector.
- Part 1 offers an overview of the state of modernization in the industry.
- Part 2 builds on this to offer policy prescriptions and suggestions for industry players.
I hope that this post series will act as a catalyst for legacy modernization initiatives at financial institutions and aid in the pursuit of innovation.
DEFINITIONS :
- Legacy modernization: Updating an existing system.
- Legacy system: Systems that have been developed and in place for many years and possess many features but are difficult to upgrade.
- Modern system: A system built with high-performance, cutting-edge features that enable easy upgrades and are able to separate code and business rules.
Key Research Questions:
- KRQ 1. Where are Japan’s insurers in terms of legacy system modernization?
- KRQ 2. What does legacy system modernization mean to insurers and why do they do it?
- KRQ 3. What does an insurer roadmap to modernization look like?
Part 1 of this post series answered the first key research question. From part 2, builds on this by seeking to answer questions two and three.
***
As the answers to the KRQ 1, we have been reviewing the following five things throughthe report Part 1.
- More insurers are seriously considering legacy modernization and moving to the implementation stage: The norm for replacement strategies is increasingly the deployment of a new system rather than a version upgrade or wrapping, with the decision driven by cost, fit with existing IT skill and aptitude levels, and risk tolerance.
- As organizations progress to the implementation stage of replacement projects: they do not always sufficiently consider potential new solutions such as software as a service (SaaS) or business process outsourcing (BPO).
- The greatest challenge for companies is selecting the optimal program.
- Business cases could be used better: They are generally only used as tools to monitor progress rather than functioning as live documents.
- Changes in the roles of business and IT units accompanying modernization: have yet to translate into changes in the responsibilities of these units.
My past report, Legacy Modernization in Japan’s Financial Industry, Part 2: argued that financial institutions looking to modernize should cease targeting a specific customer demographic and shift to a new strategy that incorporates the below points:
- Create a community with customers using advanced digital technologies.
- Build an ecosystem across the entire value chain.
- Adopt technologies that can be reused and improved.
- Transition to technology as a service, white-label products, and to revenue generating models.
In other words, Celent sees legacy modernization as nothing short of a wholesale upgrade of how companies do business and a strategic move in terms of both digitization and innovation.
Now we will focus on an in-depth look at legacy system modernization for the insurance industry and suggestions for insurers in Japan.
FIG1: Legacy modernization is at its heart the modernization of business
Related releases:
Legacy Modernization in Japan’s Insurance Industry, Part 1: Survey Analysis and Status Update
Legacy Modernization in Japan’s Insurance Industry, Part 2: Prescriptions and Proposals
To be continued – Click to read more