Vendors
日本語

The Disruptive Potential of Bitcoin: Why Everyone in Financial Services Should Care

Create a vendor selection project
Click to express your interest in this report
Indication of coverage against your requirements
A subscription is required to activate this feature. Contact us for more info.
Celent have reviewed this profile and believe it to be accurate.
We are waiting for the vendor to publish their solution profile. Contact us or request the RFX.
Projects allow you to export Registered Vendor details and survey responses for analysis outside of Marsh CND. Please refer to the Marsh CND User Guide for detailed instructions.
Download Registered Vendor Survey responses as PDF
Contact vendor directly with specific questions (ie. pricing, capacity, etc)
10 August 2014

Abstract

Bitcoin is new and very different from anything that has come before. Not surprisingly, it polarises opinions and has equally strong advocates and critics. The objective of this report is to dispel some of the popular myths and misunderstandings about Bitcoin and to assess its prospects in an objective way.

Today Bitcoin is mostly known as a currency and as a payment method. However, in the medium-to-long run, blockchain technology behind Bitcoin has the potential to be a disruptive influence way beyond payments. We think that everyone in financial services — from banks and traditional payment systems to insurance carriers and exchanges, central counterparty clearinghouses, and settlement systems — should know and care about Bitcoin.

The report, The Disruptive Potential of Bitcoin: Why Everyone in Financial Services Should Care explains the inner workings of Bitcoin by dispelling five myths. It describes the ecosystem of various different companies that have emerged around Bitcoin, and recognises some of the early achievements of this ecosystem.

However, we also note manifold challenges facing Bitcoin in its quest for mass market adoption. Of the top 10 challenges identified by the report, we consider poor user experience, safety of funds, and regulatory concerns leading to regulatory uncertainty to be the most damaging for Bitcoin’s near-term success. The protocol’s decentralised nature is both one the most attractive features for Bitcoin supporters and a considerable challenge for the overall ecosystem.

However, it would be short-sighted not to recognise that at the heart of Bitcoin is a fundamental innovation — a decentralised cryptographic ledger called blockchain. Bitcoin is the first implementation of such a ledger and keeps track of value-transfer transactions. Yet, such a cryptoledger could also be used to exchange and keep track of other digital assets, from a wide range of financial instruments to public records to smart contracts. There are a number of projects under way, seeking to either enhance the features of Bitcoin or to develop alternative approaches based on similar underlying principles. Some of them, such as Ripple, look particularly promising and are beginning to enjoy success in trying to improve rather than replace the established ecosystem.

We may be finding ourselves at the onset of a truly disruptive revolution. Just like HTTP became a protocol for information exchange, Bitcoin, Ripple, and other decentralised ledger-based solutions might be seen as the protocol for value exchange, promising exciting possibilities, some of which are difficult to imagine at this stage.

“Bitcoin, and especially its underlying technology blockchain, is a marvelous technological innovation. However, in its current form it may never be ready for prime time,” says Zilvinas Bareisis, Senior Analyst with Celent’s Banking Group and author of the report. “And that is the challenge for established players today: engaging with cryptocurrencies directly is risky in the short term, but ignoring them altogether might look very foolish in the long term.”