Vendors
日本語

Robotic Process Automation in Risk and Compliance

Create a vendor selection project
Click to express your interest in this report
Indication of coverage against your requirements
A subscription is required to activate this feature. Contact us for more info.
Celent have reviewed this profile and believe it to be accurate.
We are waiting for the vendor to publish their solution profile. Contact us or request the RFX.
Projects allow you to export Registered Vendor details and survey responses for analysis outside of Marsh CND. Please refer to the Marsh CND User Guide for detailed instructions.
Download Registered Vendor Survey responses as PDF
Contact vendor directly with specific questions (ie. pricing, capacity, etc)
7 August 2018

Benefits, Challenges, and Use Cases

Key research questions

  • What is RPA?
  • Why do RPA projects fail?
  • When is RPA most impactful?

Abstract

There are an abundance of tasks across risk and compliance operations that can be automated using robotics. But early implementations are not providing the expected results. The disappointment with early implementations is not a reflection of RPA as a technology. Rather, it is a lack of good governance and advance planning.

A typical bank employee makes 10 to 30 errors per 100 opportunities. Now consider a top UK-based global financial institution that employs 12,000 fraud anti-money laundering (AML) and compliance analysts. The math is alarming. RPA, as a set of technologies that enables the automation of tasks currently requiring human involvement, is a compelling business approach to the problems of staffing, risk mitigation, and the management of compliance.