Vendors
日本語

ACORD XML Standards in US Insurance

Create a vendor selection project
Click to express your interest in this report
Indication of coverage against your requirements
A subscription is required to activate this feature. Contact us for more info.
Celent have reviewed this profile and believe it to be accurate.
We are waiting for the vendor to publish their solution profile. Contact us or request the RFX.
Projects allow you to export Registered Vendor details and survey responses for analysis outside of Marsh CND. Please refer to the Marsh CND User Guide for detailed instructions.
Download Registered Vendor Survey responses as PDF
Contact vendor directly with specific questions (ie. pricing, capacity, etc)
9 October 2002

Abstract

New York, NY, USA October 9, 2002

Use of ACORD XML could save industry over US$250 million annually.

Celent痴 new report, , finds that the US insurance industry is increasingly embracing ACORD XML.

"Carriers surveyed by Celent either expected to achieve or had already achieved integration efficiencies on the order of 20%-30% by using ACORD XML standards

," says Matthew Josefowicz, a senior analyst at Celent and author of the report. "If embraced universally throughout the US insurance industry, the use of standards could save the industry over US$250 million in technology costs annually."

72% of the top 50 US P/C carriers and 46% of the top 50 US L/H carriers are ACORD members, as are 52% of the top global reinsurance carriers. ACORD currently maintains three separate XML standards: one each for Life, P&C/ Surety, and Reinsurance. Each standard consists of a data definition or model, a tabular data structure, and a transaction wrapper.

Celent found that carriers are embracing standards for five main reasons: to speed integration with external business partners; to speed integration with external technology vendors; to enable internal integration; to save time and effort from developing internal standards; and to avoid internal political conflict.

Actual usage of standards in production-level technology projects, however, is still at a relatively early stage. Celent痴 survey determined that the main reasons carriers delay adopting standards are: that their business partners are not yet using standards; that using standards adds unnecessary complexity; that they have already developed internal schemas; that standards are not comprehensive; and that standards are immature. Even considering these issues, Celent believes that given the potential savings to be had, carriers should aggressively face their fear of being first movers in order to start saving as soon as possible. Celent predicts that the majority of new insurance IT projects that involve XML will be based on ACORD XML standards within three or four years.

The report includes two case studies that illustrate some of the advantages gained and challenges faced by carriers implementing ACORD standards in technology projects. The first case study examines the experience of a carrier that is using the standards in internal systems development. The second looks at using the standards to integrate with business partners.

A is available online.

of Celent Communications' Property/Casualty Insurance and Life/Health Insurance research services can download the report electronically by clicking on the icon to the left.

Send mail to info@celent.com with questions or comments about this Web site.